From 7d09466da0552c17b9968fa92d8ede534abfbbb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Selene ToyKeeper
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 20:17:09 -0600
Subject: un-hardcoded 255 as the highest PWM level, and used a "PWM_TOP" value
 instead (should make gradual adjustments work better on devices with more
 than 8 bits of PWM resolution)

---
 spaghetti-monster/fsm-ramping.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'spaghetti-monster/fsm-ramping.c')

diff --git a/spaghetti-monster/fsm-ramping.c b/spaghetti-monster/fsm-ramping.c
index 52a7246..7bee07e 100644
--- a/spaghetti-monster/fsm-ramping.c
+++ b/spaghetti-monster/fsm-ramping.c
@@ -146,13 +146,13 @@ void gradual_tick() {
 
     gt --;  // convert 1-based number to 0-based
 
-    uint8_t target;
+    PWM_DATATYPE target;
 
     #if PWM_CHANNELS >= 1
     target = PWM_GET(pwm1_levels, gt);
     if ((gt < actual_level)     // special case for FET-only turbo
             && (PWM1_LVL == 0)  // (bypass adjustment period for first step)
-            && (target == 255)) PWM1_LVL = 255;
+            && (target == PWM_TOP)) PWM1_LVL = PWM_TOP;
     else if (PWM1_LVL < target) PWM1_LVL ++;
     else if (PWM1_LVL > target) PWM1_LVL --;
     #endif
-- 
cgit v1.2.3