diff options
| author | Selene ToyKeeper | 2024-03-26 03:41:17 -0600 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Selene ToyKeeper | 2024-03-26 03:41:17 -0600 |
| commit | 35b5c42f8996167248b7e6d2e4053f6bbef1505c (patch) | |
| tree | 7b852c3965c277e749285ceeaccd043730647210 /hw/mateminco/arch | |
| parent | dammit, got alkaline detection half working and then my flashing adapter died (diff) | |
| download | anduril-35b5c42f8996167248b7e6d2e4053f6bbef1505c.tar.gz anduril-35b5c42f8996167248b7e6d2e4053f6bbef1505c.tar.bz2 anduril-35b5c42f8996167248b7e6d2e4053f6bbef1505c.zip | |
d3aa: got weak battery detection actually working,
and not letting the magic smoke out of updi adapters any more (probably)
The alkaline detection might be a little too lenient though; it
could potentially fail to activate limits when the cell is completely
full or stronger than an average alkaline. One of my test cells
measured at 72 / 75, so if it was just a little stronger it'd pass...
but most alkalines I tried were in the 40 to 60 range and failed easily.
OTOH, if I make it easier to fail, it's likely to trip on normal li-ion
cells, and I don't want that.
So as a future enhancement idea, maybe it should have a smaller sag
threshold for AA and a larger threshold for li-ion. That would reduce
false negatives for AA, while still preventing false positives for li-ion.
Diffstat (limited to 'hw/mateminco/arch')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions